What’s Ken Lewis Whining About?

Saturday, February 21, 2009 13:50
Posted in category BAC, Bailout, Special Reports

ken_lewis1Amid growing rumors of bank nationalization, which the WSJ and Dow Jones attribute to ChartingStocks.net, the great wealth destroying CEO of Bank of America felt obliged to give an emergency interview  yesterday to play down talks of government takeover.

“When you talk about nationalization of Bank of America, it becomes absurd. What it appears to be are a bunch of malicious rumors,”  Ken Lewis said in an interview. He went on to say “Our company continues to be profitable…We see no reason why a company that is profitable with strong levels of capital and liquidity and that continues to lend actively should be considered for nationalization.”

Well Ken, let us help you out and give you a few reasons:

1. The US taxpayer has already provided your company with $45 billion in direct capital and another $140 billion to support your most toxic and worthless assets. You’re entire company has a market capitalization of $24 billion, and so, the US taxpayer has already provided Bank of America with enough capital to buy your entire company 8 times over.

2. Were it not for the implied quasi backing of the US government, you would have no access to the credit markets to raise capital. You’ve benefited from a sweetheart deal which allowed you to issue $8 billion in low interest rate debt which is back by the FDIC. Again, transferring more of your companies risk to the public.

3. New Management. Like any good acquirer of companies, people foreign to your company will come in and do away with the “Low hanging fruit.” I can’t think of a better person to start with than you. I understand the extent of the systemic decline of the economy, but you sir have contributed greatly to your companies demise.

You thought it prudent to buy $2 billion of preferred stock from Countrywide which could be converted at $18 per share. After the deal, Countrywide’s shares continued to plummet on “Rumors” of bankruptcy and so you doubled down and invested another $4 billion to buy Countywide financial.

You though it prudent to buy Merrill Lynch, a company riddled in toxic assets, for $50 billion. The deal was announced on a Sunday, when everyone on the street new Merrill wouldn’t be open for business the following Monday without a deal. I’m curious as to your due diligence process? Morgan Stanley’s John Mack just took over Smith Barney for a few billion dollars. Take notes Ken.

Needless to say, a little bit of patience Mr. Lewis, would have gone a long way. Both companies could have been bought for pennies on each of the dollars you wasted if you only waited.

4. Profits. We’re glad that your company is profitable (as you claim) but we, the public, are outraged that you’ve used our money to nationalize your worthless assets while allowing you to keep your profits private. I was against giving your company any money at all, but since you survive only because of the American public, why should you’re shareholders be rewarded privately? Private investors aren’t willing to give you any money.

Side note: HOW ON EARTH CAN YOU NOT TURN A PROFIT with all of the handout you’ve been given? At the rate of your “Profits” of about $4 billion, maybe you’ll be able to pay us back (in 45 years).

The fact of the matter is that you’ve already been nationalized. You survive only because of the implied backing of the US government via the taxpayer. We’ve subsidized your cost of borrowing through FDIC backed debt, placed a market value on your unmarketable and worthless debt, and have given you direct cash infusions. What right do you have to whine?

So what do we mean when we say nationalization if it already happened? We mean that these companies will be taken over by the government to stop the free fall of the common stock. As Citi and B of A continue to plummet to new lows, depositors will move their money out. The run has probably already started. To prevent chaos on the banking system the government WILL step in as your stocks trade lower and lower. Nobody wants there life savings on deposit in a bank that trades at 2 or 3 bucks.

Side Note: Since it’s so absurd and unfounded that your company is in trouble, why don’t you eat your own cooking and take your company private? You’re awash with government cash. Buy you’re shares and go private.

Related posts:

  1. Citi Gets Nationalized; Don’t Call It Nationalization
  2. Citi in Talks With Government
  3. Nothing’s True Until it’s Officially Denied: Ken Lewis on “Rumors”
  4. The Bank Swindle: Putting it in Perspective
  5. Capital One Fraudsters Exposed

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

6 Responses to “What’s Ken Lewis Whining About?”

  1. Ali says:

    February 21st, 2009 at 5:35 pm

    Nationalization is a dumb idea and it is absurd. If the government leaves theses banks alone with the money they currently have they will survive. Citi Bank is the most capitalized bank right now (thanks to the tax payer) BUT They don’t need more and they don’t want more. They promised to become profitable and pay it back but everybody should relax. TARP funds are just settling in give these guys at least a year to make a profit. Its been less then 4 months since Citi got any loans you can’t expect them to day trade these loans and pay it back today. It doesn’t work like that. The shorts have created rumors and once again the SEC wont put a stop to it and the treasury wont stop it. We will see a massive rally on the upside when things clear up.

  2. chartingstocks1 says:

    February 21st, 2009 at 6:22 pm

    they are insolvent..they have no access to the credit market without the us gov…the toxic debt on their balance sheet is bigger than the GDP of MOST countries..dont believe the media hype

  3. bosunj says:

    February 22nd, 2009 at 2:27 am

    Great suggestion about taking the business private.

    May I suggest a guillotine for whiners like this Lewis idiot? Or, if that’s to quick, tar and feathers followed by a rope?

    Lewis! Shut up!

  4. a says:

    February 22nd, 2009 at 3:58 am

    Funny how everyone thinks they know everything, nationalization wont solve anything except cause even more bankruptcies between private investors and large corporations… The market needs to heal itself and it needs time to do that, stop whining and wishing for the collapse of the entire country.

  5. chartingstocks1 says:

    February 22nd, 2009 at 9:34 am

    why would the entire country collapse if B of A and Citi are taken over? They’ve already been nationalized, but the public only shares in the losses. I didnt agree with giving them money, but since we did, why should they be profiting privately? no private money is flowing into them.

    I think you’re using false slippery slope argument which, by the way, assumes that we aren’t going to collapse regardless.

  6. chartingstocks1 says:

    February 22nd, 2009 at 10:47 pm

    not so crazy after all…citi is in talks with the US gov

Leave a Reply

Legal Disclaimer All stock price information provided by Charting Stocks is for informational purposes only and is not intended for trading purposes. Neither Charting Stocks nor its affiliates guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or sequence of any stock price information or other data displayed or in the transmission of any stocks price information or data. The stock price information is not to be relied upon for trading, business or financial purposes and Charting Stocks and its service providers are not liable or responsible in any way for any damages, losses or costs arising from the reliance of this information or incurred as a result of the non performance, interruption or termination for any reason whatsoever of the stock price information provided. It is urged that you consult with your financial professional before making any decisions related to buying or selling securities.