Charles Dow Rolls in His Grave: The Distortion of the Average He Made Famous
Friday, March 6, 2009 17:57Have you ever asked yourself why the Dow Jones Industrial Average contains non-industrial stocks? Why such a large weighting is given to financial companies such as American Express, Bank of America, Citigroup, JP Morgan and AIG (Before its removal)? After all, you wouldn’t expect to see General Motors included in the healthcare index or Goldman Sachs in the home builder index.
The Wikipedia entry for the Dow Jones Industrial Average states that:
“The average is computed from the stock prices of 30 of the largest and most widely held public companies in the United States. The “industrial” portion of the name is largely historical—many of the 30 modern components have little to do with traditional heavy industry.”
We do not dispute the claim that the “industrial” portion is largely historical. Indeed, there are components which have little to do with industry. Financial companies, which do not produce anything, comprise a large weighting the in this average of American Industry.
Over the last 20 years, the Dow Jones has been reshaped into a basket of 30 conglomerate corporations with little regard for the actual business they’re in. Today’s Dow Jones would be unrecognizable to the man who created it over a century ago.
History
The index was first published in 1896 by Charles Dow, Founder of the Dow Jones Company and Wall Street Journal. Mr. Dow created and monitored a list of important industrial companies. Along with the Industrial Average, he created the Railroad Index (Transportation) which he tracked along with the industrial stocks to gauge the health of the economy.
The Dow Theory was created based on the notion that both indexes should rise together in a healthy economy. The concept was a simple one. While industrial companies made the goods, the rails transported those goods to market. One couldn’t function without the other.
The original Industrial Average contained 12 industrial (Producers of goods) stocks:
- American Cotton Oil Company
- American Sugar Company
- American Tobacco Company
- Chicago Gas Company
- Distilling & Cattle Feeding Company
- General Electric
- Laclede Gas Light Company
- National Lead Company
- North American Company, (Edison) electric company
- Tennessee Coal,
- U.S. Leather Company
- United States Rubber Company
Notice that all of the companies in the index were producers of goods. There were no financial or bank stocks included in the average. At the time of his death in 1902, Charles Dow’s industrial average contained 12 stocks which were comprised of industrial producing companies such as US Steel, US Rubber, National Lead, American Car and Foundry, etc. Still no banks.
The Dow Jones Begins to Change
1982
80 years after the death of Charles Dow, American Express was added to the Dow Jones Industrial Average. This marked the first time that a financial stock was added to the century old index.
1988
American Can, a manufacturer of tin cans merged with Commercial Credit Corporation and adopted the name Primerica.
1991
JP Morgan was introduced to the Dow Jones in 1991 and replaced Primerica Corporation.
1997
Travelers Group was added to the index. The company would later change its name to Citigroup.
2004
AIG was added.
2008
Bank of America was added.
Reasons:
We struggle to find an explanation as to why such changes were made. Was it because America became de-industrialized over the last quarter century? Was it merely a reflection of big business today, with companies such as General Motors and General Electric playing dominant roles in non-core businesses such as finance and banking? Or were these financial stocks added to the index in hopes of propping up its value with companies such as JP Morgan and AIG, whose earning power seemed indestructible? Our hunch is that it was a combination of each.
Implications
Since the premise of Dow’s Theory is based on the relationship between the producers of goods (Industrials) and the shippers of goods (Transportation) it is important that the underlying components of these two sister averages reflect their intended purpose. How can market technicians apply Dow Theory today when the industrial average is NOT made up of industrial stocks? The theory is obviously flawed and has been for the past 2 decades. This may explain some of the notable false, or late, signals given over the past 20 years.
Would Charlie Dow’s industrial index be trading at 6,500 today? The chart below suggests that it wouldn’t. Sure, in a bear market all stocks go down though some more than others. This collapse was led by the bank stocks. If the Dow Jones Industrial Average was made up of industrial stocks, as intended, it would have avoided the loss of nearly 100% in AIG, 97% in Citigroup, 92% in Bank of America, 80% in American Express and 57% in JP Morgan, all of which performed worse than the index itself.
Market Technicians may need to rethink the application of Dow Theory and find an alternative measure to gauge industrial stocks. The Dow Jones Industrial Average of today is neither industrial nor consistent with the applications of its founder Charles H Dow.

Related posts:






















Dan says:
March 7th, 2009 at 9:10 am
The most important element of all this you unfortunately left out. The Dow-Jones Industrial Average — IS NOT A TRUE AVERAGE ! ! ! It is a factored — or weighted average. If you actually add up the closing price of the Dow 30 stocks and divide by 30 you will not get the same number that is published as the D-J Ind. Average. The divisor number in the formula is a highly manipulated figure that changes every day to suit the taste of the people who produce it. It is like Alice in Wonderland: Those numbers mean what I want them to mean.
Joe S. says:
March 7th, 2009 at 9:35 am
Very good information. Thanks. I notice also that almost all the companies on Dow’s original list are gone now. So much for ‘Buy and Hold’ philosophy! I also wonder about how price inflation and stock splits can be readily calculated for a meaningful average, and it occurs to me that they can’t. It’s all just a propaganda tool, isn’t it?
chartingstocks1 says:
March 7th, 2009 at 9:56 am
DAN: the divisor is another change which is relevant. very good point..The original Dow had no complicated divisor..it was a simple average calculation…the focus of the article was the adding of financial stocks…but definitely a good point..thank you..
Joe S: GE still remains (though who knows for how long)….i did a piece on here a few months ago, when the dow was 8,000 and calculated the average annual return is 4% or so for 100 years….but that estimated is actually OVERSTATED as most of those stocks aren’t around anymore
Niles Lesh says:
March 8th, 2009 at 6:25 am
So, let me see if I got this straight. 1982 begins the entry of financial sectors to the DOW. The financial sector’s valuation is total speculative(non-durable). A futures based price index that is co opted by dollar values, inflation and interest rates. Alan Greenspan starts to roll back interest rates in the Reagan supply side consumer driven economy. Credit flows and the dollar soars against foreign currency, which drives the financial sector and the DOW to record highs. 1987 the market begins to realize that the dollar is inflated and needs a place to go. Hello NASDAQ and Microsoft! The shift to tech stocks allows the dollar/DOW to suck wind for a few more years until they can get the GLASS-Stegall ACT repealed, then comes CITIGROUP and the DOW party is on again! AIG with some prescient airline and insurance stock shorting in the summer of 2001vaults into a post Glass-Stegall giant. Now its 2004 and the mortgage market is ripe for the plucking, AIG welcome to the DOW, good friends Merril and BOA take on risk and profit. 2007 the smart money starts to leave the market and the less smart money starts to ask “hey are these stocks & mortgages really worth anything” ?
Charles Dow says” I tried to tell you but…”
Miiguel Martinez says:
March 8th, 2009 at 9:42 am
Why GM is now in huge troubles? I believe it is not beacause the flawed application of the Dow theory, it has to be because the bad managment of the company, CEO and executives with millionare and abusive salaries and privileges for all the company workers, finnally who paid this money?? the end consumers. Credit, abuse in the subprime mortgages and dreaming all the time with speculations are the cause of this disaster.
Дмитрий says:
June 4th, 2009 at 4:55 am
Разное