<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Charting Stocks &#187; Economists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chartingstocks.net/tag/economists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chartingstocks.net</link>
	<description>REAL Stock Market News and Insight</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 17:35:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Durable Goods Figures Were NOT Good; Even if the Media Wants Them to be</title>
		<link>http://www.chartingstocks.net/2009/03/durable-goods-figures-were-not-good-even-if-the-media-wants-them-to-be/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chartingstocks.net/2009/03/durable-goods-figures-were-not-good-even-if-the-media-wants-them-to-be/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chartingstocks1</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commerce dept]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[djia futures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[durable goods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic activity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media bias]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chartingstocks.net/?p=1573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The DJIA futures were set for a higher open this morning as orders for durable goods unexpectedly &#8220;jumped&#8221;  in February, which &#8220;surprised&#8221; many economists. Well,  at least that was the headline on  the major financial news sites but if we look at the data for ourselves, or even look past the headline and actually read [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chartingstocks.net/2009/03/durable-goods-figures-were-not-good-even-if-the-media-wants-them-to-be/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Too Big to SAVE?</title>
		<link>http://www.chartingstocks.net/2009/03/too-big-to-save/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chartingstocks.net/2009/03/too-big-to-save/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 22:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chartingstocks1</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Special Reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bank of america]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[banks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citigroup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government consults]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guarantees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[institutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax revenues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trillion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world gdp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chartingstocks.net/?p=1204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We hear much about institutions being too big to fail, and so, the taxpayer is expected to bear any cost to save large financial companies. We think that the more relevant question to ask is whether these institutions are too big to save?
With the passage of the most recent bailout bill, the taxpayer is now [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chartingstocks.net/2009/03/too-big-to-save/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Empire State index falls to new record low</title>
		<link>http://www.chartingstocks.net/2008/12/empire-state-index-falls-to-new-record-low/</link>
		<comments>http://www.chartingstocks.net/2008/12/empire-state-index-falls-to-new-record-low/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chartingstocks1</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collapse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic pulse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[empire state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[factory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[institute for supply management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leading indicator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacturing sector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survey]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chartingstocks.net/?p=595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Empire State Manufacturing index fell to a record low of -25.8 showing the continued collapse in manufacturing throughout the New York area. Unfilled orders fell to a record low and prices paid contracted by 7.5%
The index is followed by economists as it tends to be a leading indicator to the Institute for Supply Management&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.chartingstocks.net/2008/12/empire-state-index-falls-to-new-record-low/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
